<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma DP2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techgoondu.com/2008/09/24/sigma-dp2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techgoondu.com/2008/09/24/sigma-dp2/</link>
	<description>Gadgets and tech news from Singapore and Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fangirl</title>
		<link>http://www.techgoondu.com/2008/09/24/sigma-dp2/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>fangirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techgoondu.com/?p=223#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I was told the Sigma is only good in a very limited lighting range, but with such a big sensor in such a small camera, I think it might be a worthwhile sacrifice. How do the Ricoh and Leica compare? They&#039;re cheaper than the Sigma, but more expensive than regular compacts, really wonder what camera makers are doing with all these new sub categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told the Sigma is only good in a very limited lighting range, but with such a big sensor in such a small camera, I think it might be a worthwhile sacrifice. How do the Ricoh and Leica compare? They&#8217;re cheaper than the Sigma, but more expensive than regular compacts, really wonder what camera makers are doing with all these new sub categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

