MeeGo steering group easing platform concerns?

March 8th, 2010 | by Aaron Tan

Valtteri Halla, the Nokia member of the MeeGo Technical Steering Group recently attempted to allay the concerns of the open source community by underscoring the importance of openness in the development of the MeeGo operating system.

In a blog post last week, the veteran Nokia executive who has been working to get Linux onto Nokia phones since 2000, announced that the MeeGo repository will be opened by the end of this month. The source and binary repo will provide a raw baseline for building MeeGo on the Nokia N900 and Intel Atom-based netbooks.

What’s more interesting is the flurry of debate surrounding the details – or lack thereof – related to the processes that will enable the open source development model to flourish around the MeeGo platform. So far, Halla has said little about the decisions made by the technical steering group to choose RPM rather than deb as the package manager for MeeGo:

While code is certainly the most important question, the most frequently asked, however, has been about technology selections. The big ticket items like Qt, OBS and RPM were already communicated at the launch and as we expected, kicked off a few small avalanches of debate! These selections were, of course, pre-agreed and I can assure you that the amount of effort spent in resolving these was not small. After all, these are the points driving most of the investment cost and transition pains for Nokia, Intel and the Moblin and Maemo communities. Further selections are mostly still under discussion and beyond a few obvious ones (X, connman, ofono, gstreamer, dbus,…) can be considered as working assumptions for MeeGo 1 release. Now that the internal responsibilities within Intel and Nokia are becoming clear I expect that the people behind these selections and assumptions will start appearing in meego.com pages, mailing lists and wikis during the coming days.

This has generated some concerns that developers are being left out of the conversation, thus increasing their skepticism of the purported “openness” of the MeeGo platform. To be fair, it was necessary for the steering group to make some hard decisions at the beginning of a big open source initiative that merges two existing platforms. Otherwise, we could argue till the cows come home and nothing will move.

But what is the process that governs these decisions? Are we talking about a process similar to JCP (Java Community Process), where there are clearly defined procedures for the development and revision of the Java’s technology specifications?

Other tough questions that need to be addressed: driver support from hardware and device manufacturers, DRM support that is compatible with operators’ content business and application support for potentially different variants of MeeGo that could emerge. The technical steering group should address these issues early on if it wants to seed a rich developer ecosystem that is crucial for the success of any mobile platform.

Advertisements

8 Comments

  1. Topper 10 says:

    Wonderful to see that Nokia has opened doors for open softwares. But I still believe it can’t be a head on competition for the Android platform. As the trackrecord of Nokia is seen, its always been hostile towards the developers.

  2. King johnson says:

    Wow.. superb.. Nokia moving into an unchanted terrrain.. I wonder how’d developers embrace this.??

  3. King Johnson says:

    Wow.. superb.. Nokia going into a entirely different world.. We’re gonna have fun..

  4. Topper 10 says:

    Nokia has been hostile towards the devloper community since a long time.. I’m just curious what we have in store with Nokia embracing open softwares and supporting the same. Is this the fall of Android ??? I’d loose my job 😛

    Check costly mobiles

  5. Finally Nokia has opened its eyes towards the open softwares.. I still how wonder how good would be the support from their side for the developer community? I seriously doubt whether meego would ever match the kind of support that android people provide. But its still good to see something rise against the giant 🙂

    Check the Costly Cellphones.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.